Not moving up to and dominating at heavyweight is the least of the knocks against Jones. He’s got an entire laundry list of issues that essentially make him the Lance Armstrong of MMA.
I thought you were some weird canadian, french british thing? Regardless of which you claim, the points stays the same. You come from lands and cultures of extreme cuckery and femininity and it effects your tastes and sensibilities just like Song’s.
The post you’ve shared doesn’t seem to be a direct example of denial; rather, it expresses skepticism and frustration. It’s critical of Jones’s legacy, highlighting concerns about his past actions and decisions. Denial typically involves refusing to accept reality or facts, while this post is acknowledging and commenting on the controversial aspects of Jones’s career.
In essence, the post reflects a clear opinion on Jones’s actions and their impact on his legacy, suggesting that his choices and history will affect how he is judged.
Better to fight past your prime because you love to fight, then to retire at 37 to avoid losing.
I find it pretty funny ppl saying we’re haters for acknowledging reality.
He has been suspended multiple times for pissing hot; Song2 just admitted they changed the rules FOR him. Those are facts, not made up hate.
There is endless footage of him poking ajd raking his fingers into opponent’s eyes; two fights were they acknowledge it and look to the ref while Jon pokes them again. That is a fact.
He has fought smaller ppl that fought at middleweight and when they were past their primes and considerably older. Those are facts.
Then theres hiding under the octagon, refusing to fight on short notice, making the UFC move an entire event across state lines. I could go on. All facts.
So, what really is strange is the choice to ignore all these facts, call ppl haters, then say you cant see why his legacy is in question.
You sirs, have consumed too much of the UFC kool-aid.