Kerr was bigger and maybe a better wrestler but I think Randleman was a better MMA fighter and would have KOed Kerr standing late in the fight. I think Randleman is good enough to avoid getting takendown early and he would outlast Kerr. Randleman has a bigger advantage if there are rounds. In almost any fight I’d pick the monster
Depended on which Kerr showed up? A full camp with Bas? Or the one half assed it because of his girlfriend?
I think a better poll would be Coleman vs Kerr
Kevin Jackson vs Randleman. Coleman vs Kerr
seems to be universaly believed that coleman would beat kerr by better wrestling
i liked kerr having better submission knowledge than hammer house, those dudes had gracie tapes instead of bjj instructors
randleman did have an x-factor of explosive strikes, and didnt have any cardio issues during his prime
Would’ve came down too who had more heart imo
Randleman has the better MMA wins.
He could also throw heavy leather – which I wish he had done more of.
I’d say Kerr in grappling and Randleman in a fight.
Whoever got the first takedown. Most likely Kerr.
That means a Kerr loss.
The guy did not handle resistance well at all.
If a guy didn’t wilt ASAP, he couldn’t win.
Coleman vs kerr in wrestling is where the ncaa mercy rule came from iirc.
Early on, Randleman did come out and beat some guys that Coleman lost to though.
Yeah I would lean with Coleman too. But he got tired in fights as well.
Almost had Fedor too.
I know this is MMA math but Coleman achieved more in mma and would bet on Coleman if they had fought
He fucking WRECKED Kerr i want to say 14-0 iirc.