Haha have fun in here dude…
‘Tribes of people talk and write to each other in their common language… therefore something something about the Old Testament and all religions…’
– DimethylSulfide, theological savant
“It’s God’s words that are translated perfectly in MY version!”
- Bocephus
LMAO… you can’t even do that right.
Bo must be making fun of my nonsense because he agrees with me!
– DimethylSulfide, non-student of logic
I ain’t feeding you or this shit thread anymore lmao. Take it easy.
Finally, some common sense. 
Abraham originated in Ur (Mesopotamia) - Akkadian
was the dominant Semitic language in Mesopotamia
1 Like
2 Likes
Not just Christians ‘seeing’ it this way… Jesus was trying to do more than break a cycle… he was trying to correct a choice that the temple Jews made to leave ‘the path’ (which led to the ‘cycle’)… Josiah had Exodus and Deuteronomy written to support his desire to consolidate power and to do so he had to get rid of many First Temple traditions… basically coming down to replacing the Melchizedek priesthood with the Moses traditions (Aaronite priesthood) - there are no references to the Moses tradition in other earlier standard sources (incl. Enoch) prior to this… Jesus was of the Melchizedek line (many signs and a few direct references to this in scripture)… he wasn’t focused on “breaking the cycle”, he was focused on renewing the First Temple path.
The OT is an absolute mess (and there is no ‘canonical’ version of it) and there are lots contemporary and early Christian sources that connect the dots… there was a lot more going on at the Second Temple when Jesus rolled up than just money changers and animal traders working in the courtyard that led to why the Second Temple leadership turned as they did… It wasn’t just Jesus proclaiming to be ‘god’; he was claiming to be the old guard Melchizedek… Jesus and the first Christians were called ‘nosrim’ (in greek Nazoraios - Engl - Nazoreans)… which means “guard” “preserve” “keep” - guard what? The old line - First Temple… in fact the form of “Nazoraios” in the INRI on the cross is unusual because “Nazareth” (which is unrelated to this word, just looks similar) was “Nazarenos” but the cross says “Nazoraios” (in Latin form) - which leads to the debate, did the cross really say “Jesus of Nazareth”?.. Also the Talmud calls Jesus “the nosri” (guard, preserver) many times… James was not as overt in his actions as Jesus, but he was trying to do the same thing…
Book of Wisdom is one of the most interesting and useful OT books to shed a little light on some of the things that were ‘disappeared’ from the First Temple.
1 Like
Yep. It was arguably the original one. Thus my reference to ‘Semitic-based’ languages… that he seems to have not gotten, since he threw back the embarrassing ‘didn’t speak Hebrew’ barb…
I hate it when two fags ruin a thread by going back and forth arguing with each other for 75% of the replies. Take it to private message ladies
Scrolling works, cowgirl… now fck off…
